NSA record gathering and cost
To the editor:
The recently revealed reports concerning the National Security Agency (NSA) are alarming. I feel much data gathering is unconstitutional, violating the Constitution (Article IV) — seizing information without probable cause and without meeting the descriptive Constitutional requirement(s).
Article IV — The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
The data collected is reportedly used to establish patterns, links, etc. to help detect terrorist activity and I can support collecting “contact” information such as addresses, phone numbers but I fear the actual intent regarding data gathering extends far further.
I question the need for the NSA to build a massive facility in Utah to only store and process statistical-type data. I believe, because of the massive size of the Utah facility, that records of “content” will be stored there for virtually all individuals – without a specific warrant being issued for the individual(s). What specific information will be gathered and stored?
I urge Congress to take action to guarantee that the NSA will not intercept, record and/or store “content” records of U.S. citizens unless a warrant for the individual(s) is issued for probable cause. A blanket warrant is not adequate. Content data should not be stored with the intention of accessing such information so it could be used in the future.
Our founding fathers intended that the government should not, must not, gather and read/use personal correspondence without just cause. This is a fundamental of freedom. I fear the actions being taken or envisioned is a violation of our personal rights.
I further feel that much greater oversight into secret agencies, including their funding, is needed. Too much taking place in secret and there seems to be little accountability. The ability to hide facts and actions under the phrase “National Security” places an umbrella of secrecy over many facts that should see the light of day.
Why so great a cost?
Further, I understand that the salary of Edward Snowden was about $200,000. He is/was an employee of Booz Hamilton (BH). He has no advanced degree; does he even hold a degree? Why are we the people paying such excessive salaries? Certainly, there are many who could do the job better for much less. Many probably here in Maine (vs. Hawaii, E. Snowden’s state). Where is the monetary oversight? Accordingly, I feel Congress should investigate the pay of contractors and consultants. Many are making a fortune at our expense and in a less than stellar economy. Look into what is paid to contractors as BH. Is the cost commensurate with the real benefit?
Much has changed since 9/11; however, that tragic event is not an excuse for undermining our personal liberty. Prompt corrective action is needed to protect our American rights.
James F. Pritchard
Chapman
